News

Bulldozers Flush Families From Dove Court

As the RRHA moves its revitalization project in, Dove Court residents have to move out and find a new place to live before the end of this summer.

Bulldozers Flush Families From Dove Court
Courtesy of Heinrich Muller


Related Articles

More Economic Development »

Sara Daves
Richmond.com
Tuesday, June 17, 2008

It will be a busy summer for Bridget Davis and her children, one of 29 families still living in the Dove Court public housing complex. The Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority plans to bulldoze the project by the end of the summer, and the residents must move.

 

Like other Dove Court residents, Davis was given three choices: Move to another public housing community; try to qualify for a mortgage loan; or participate in the Section 8 program, which provides a voucher to rent an apartment or house.

 

Davis chose the voucher program and was given until July 31 to find another place to live. She has not found one yet.


"I've been looking, but there is nowhere to go," said Davis.

 

Davis is worried – but at the same time, her children said they will be happy to leave Dove Court. Shaqula Davis, a 10th-grader, and Ziontae, a ninth-grader, said the 64 units of Dove Court have become a ghost town.

 

"All the ones with boards on the windows are the empty ones," Ziontae said.

 

He said he'll be glad to get away from Armstrong High School and some of its students, too.

 

"I don't like it," Ziontae said. "They fight too much. People influence me to skip with them."

 

The siblings both have a hopeful list of schools they would like to attend next year.

 

"I would like to move to the West End," Davis said. But it's hard to find a home where the Section 8 voucher will cover the rent – if the landlord will accept Section 8 participants at all.

 

Residents who do not find housing through Section 8 vouchers will be temporarily placed in another public housing community, according to the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority.

 

"We are responsible for the relocation of all Dove Court residents," said Valena Dixon, the RRHA's communications director.

 

She said Dove Court is being emptied and demolished as part of a revitalization project approved by the agency a year ago. Revitalization plans also include demolishing the empty North Ridge and Carrington Gardens apartments.

 

Dixon says there are big plans for redevelopment of the entire area. Those plans may depend on private developers getting government assistance, in the form of tax credits, to build new housing.

 

The tax credits are doled out by the Virginia Housing Development Authority, a state agency. The RRHA had applied to the VHDA for tax credits to redevelop Dove Court, North Ridge and Carrington Gardens.

 

But last month, the VHDA announced that it was awarding the tax credits to a company associated with former football star Tiki Barber to redevelop the Woodcroft public housing community in Richmond's Fulton Hill area.

 

Although Dove Court lost out in the latest competition for tax credits, that redevelopment project is still alive.

"There is another opportunity for the RRHA to gain tax credits in February 2009," Dixon said. "We are still moving forward with plans."

 

Those plans include eventually redeveloping Gilpin Court. In late summer or fall, the RRHA will start formulating a master plan for that housing project. A plan for Gilpin Court is one of the agency's priorities this year.

 

Gilpin Court is considered the big fish. With 783 units, it is the largest public housing project in the city. Its revitalization has become a controversial topic. The area is a highly coveted because of the VCU Biotech Park and Philip Morris.

 

"We know Gilpin Court revitalization will take five to 10 years, and demolition will not start for at least three years," Dixon said.

 

She said the RRHA will seek input from all facets of the community in crafting a redevelopment plan for the area.

Why are so many public housing projects being dismantled and redeveloped? Because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has told cities to break up the concentrations of poverty created by public housing.

 

In the 1940s, '50s and '60s, projects were intentionally designed to isolate the poor. Now HUD's mandate is to de-concentrate poverty – and the new policy's growing pains have made some people leery.

 

No wonder: Critics point to the Blackwell public housing community, which the RRHA leveled in 1999.

"The RRHA tore down 440 good public housing units," said Marcel Slag of the Legal Aid Justice Center, an advocacy group for low-income residents.

 

"They may have built something, but they have not replaced one public housing unit in Blackwell. This doesn't help the poor."

 

Anthony Scott, RRHA's executive director, understands the public's lack of confidence about rebuilding what is torn down.

"We know that Blackwell is a black mark on our agency. We are committed to make sure that does not happen again. I promise you," Scott said at a recent public meeting, according to an article in the Richmond Voice newspaper.

 

This story is courtesy of Capital News Service, a flagship program of the VCU School of Mass Communications. Students participating in the program provide state government coverage for Virginia's community newspapers, under the supervision of associate professor Jeff South. CNS operates as a three-credit course during spring semesters, when the General Assembly is in session. Each CNS student is assigned to serve one or more client newspapers. Students must devote substantial time outside class to CNS -- at least 10 hours a week.


Printer Friendly Version  Email Article to a Friend  RSS Feeds


11 comments.
Ms Davis - Email this User
7/24/2008 at 11:40:26 AM Flag Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

I feel that we as black people are indde on our way. It is so hard today. I live in the Hillside Community and it is sad. Every year these communities get a certain amount of money to help over the summer with the children and nothing happens. I have been living there 3 months and there has not been on improvement. The apartments are burned down and rat infested. In thae last 3 monts I have caught over 20 mice. and all they have to say is call an exterminator. No!! These communities are suppose to help us start a level of independence. I don't get it eveytime you get a dollar they wantt 90 cent, that is not helping us. So now instead of us saving up tring to get out we are in a bind trying to pay the rent which is now 4oo dollaars because i mak 8.75. Now do you deel me . Where is the help? I feel like for those mothers like me who are up and out working everyday trying that we shoul get some type of grievance on our rent. We still have to take care of our kids, most of us working don't receive food stamps. Grocery prices are through the roof and what about us who pay life insurance "WE NEED THAT". Daycare. All i am saying is that If the PProjects were meant to help why do I and so many other hardworking mother feel like it is a method just to keep all of us working or not working in the hole. Its like the more we try the worse they get. Just think about the section 8, some people are just gettin that afer 8 and 10 years


Tenita Mayo - Email this User
7/17/2008 at 11:21:18 AM Flag Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

It's a shame that low income families don't have a chance to get ahead. As a Gilpin Court residence, it's a hard way of living so we live hard that why it's so much violence. It seems like nobody cares about the kids and their future. The schools that they are subject to go to are not passing SOLs and it's just so much that I could say about this messed up system that keeps Gilpin Court down.


Chris M - Email this User
6/19/2008 at 8:43:24 AM Flag Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/memphis-crime

Very interesting article on the possible role of Section Eight housing in the rising crime rates of mid-sized cities.


Another Disturbed Reader
6/18/2008 at 5:25:10 PM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

These comments below, excepting those of Disturbed Reader, are very troubling and I disagree with them wholeheartedly. First, the comments about tax credits and assistance ignore the fact that middle- and upper-income folks get tax credits and assistance, too, in the form of mortgage interest deductions, higher education tax credits, etc. (I've certainly benefited from both.) Moreover, the average income of families living in public housing is roughly $10,000 per year. Many are headed by elderly or disabled individuals, or single parents. Many cannot work, and of those who can, many do. Certainly, there are probably some families that have the capacity, with assistance and prompting, to move out of public housing or Section 8 voucher assistance and into market-rate housing -- an assumption that relies upon them being able to find living-wage jobs that are geographically and educationally accessible to them. They should be given every opportunity and encouragement to do so. But, for many families, public housing is a last resort against homelessness. Deconcentrating poverty by creating mixed-income communities may be a good idea, but only if it benefits the neediest families in our community. Simply kicking families to the curb is not tough love or fairness, but rather the imprimatur of a heartless society that has strayed far from recognizing the dignity of our fellow human beings.


Disturbed Reader
6/18/2008 at 1:04:51 PM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Okay, I've read the comments and I am not surprised the residents are PERCEIVED as lazy free-loaders.... BUT.... unless you know someone in that community, then you may just be speculating. Assumptions can be very dangerous... to assume someone is LAZY because they are on Section 8 is a bad idea. I know a lady who is on Section 8 and she is NOT lazy; actually, she's not living well, she's just getting by. She has an apartment where her "voucher" covers most of the rent, but she pays the remainder of it. I'm just saying, people have situations, and let's not roll them up into a stereotype.


Working Man
6/17/2008 at 3:48:21 PM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Imminent domain issues happen all the time. So does private redevelopment. Get over it. You live in crappy Section 8 housing anyway. What does it matter if you have to move? You are still living under a free roof (well, free to you though you forget that we working folk are footing the bill.) You can't afford to raise your family? Have a smaller family. Condoms are still free at the Health Department, aren't they? Don't like your low paying job? Get a better one. Go to night school. Read a book and quit paying for cable (as I am sure half of the residents in Dove have it.) Cut up your credit cards, quit going to Rent-A-Center, quit smoking, quit buying lotto tickets, use protection -- quit complaining. You are the reason people like you complain about America.


Ryan
6/17/2008 at 11:05:00 AM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

If the government was to require drug tests and proof that these people are looking for jobs and going on interviews, then there would be a hell of a difference in our society as a whole. It will only get worse and worse at this pace.


Housey
6/17/2008 at 10:28:43 AM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

While it stinks they're losing their home, these housing projects need to go anyways. Many of them are havens for drugs and crime and children raised in them often do not get anywhere in life. Good for these kids to realize that however the mom living off the govt...that's pathetic.


Fed Up!
6/17/2008 at 10:17:51 AM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. How do we expect people to ever get off of public assitance if we constantly give them "tax credits" and "rent vouchers"?? I say, give them two years with assitance, everything from rent to groceries AND job training. If they can't do it on their own after that... forget it. Too many people are lazy in this country and now those of us who do work, are feeling the pain in our own wallets paying for this crap!


AMEN
6/17/2008 at 9:31:23 AM Flag
Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Seriously, I go to work every single day. I work my tail off to pay my mortgage. Where's my break? What does this teach your children? If you're lazy and don't get a job, the government will pay for it? I work so hard to pay for others while I'm struggling myself. The cycle will continue if nothing is done.


Lathum - Email this User
6/17/2008 at 9:07:41 AM Flag Flag Comment
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

I have a great idea, why doesn't this lady get a job and not rely on free government handout. A lot of people work their butts off to pay their rent. This lady gets her rent paid for her. This lady needs to get a job and so do her kids. Here's a question... Does this lady or any of her kids have cell phone? If the answer is yes, why do my tax dollars pay for their rent? and probably there food too.



Name: *
E-Mail:
URL:
Comment: *
What is 2 + 2? *
To help protect against spam, please answer the above question

  

Disclaimer: Richmond.com reserves the right to edit and/or publish your contributions via e-mail, story comments, etc. Inappropriate comments will be subject to immediate removal without notice.