Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Chesterfield judge sets aside jury's verdict that found man guilty of killing teen who stole car
0 Comments
breaking

Chesterfield judge sets aside jury's verdict that found man guilty of killing teen who stole car

  • 0

Chesterfield Commonwealth's Attorney Stacey Davenport speaks about the recent judicial reversal of a murder conviction.

A Chesterfield County judge has set aside a jury’s verdict that found a Chester man guilty of fatally shooting a teen he chased down after the teen stole a car belonging to the defendant’s girlfriend. The ruling supports a defense motion that the evidence was insufficient to prove who fired the shots.

The conviction reversal has frustrated and outraged Chesterfield Police Chief Jeffrey Katz and Commonwealth’s Attorney Stacey Davenport, who held a news conference Tuesday to denounce the judge’s decision.

“The defendant opted for a jury trial,” Katz said. “He got one. Members of our community, in their capacity as jurors, dispassionately weighed and synthesized evidence and testimony, returning a guilty verdict. For a judge to replace his judgement for that of the men and women of the jury is highly irregular. Doing so marginalizes the victim, denies justice to those who loved him, and removes the role of community involvement in the administration of justice.”

Davenport said Circuit Judge David E. Johnson’s actions deny Virginia’s appellate courts an opportunity to review the case and sets a “very dangerous precedent.” She said it undermines the “sanctity and validity of a jury’s verdict.”

As a result of Johnson’s decision, which comes three months after the trial, the defendant “will be acquitted, he will be released — a free man — with no remorse left for [the victim’s] family or this community,” Davenport added. “Because under the doctrine of double jeopardy, [the defendant] cannot be tried for these crimes again. Never before have I seen a judge completely set aside a jury’s guilty verdict and acquitted the defendant.”

Johnson wrote in a July 8 decision that the jury could reasonably find from the evidence that Demetrius Roots, 21, and his girlfriend, Samira Tarabay-Whitfield, 22 — who also is charged in the case — were in the vicinity of the shooting when it occurred, based on cellphone location records, and were moving together after the Sept. 26, 2019, slaying of 18-year-old Bryson Mitchell.

But after that point, Johnson said, “reasonable inference ends and speculation, supposition and suspicion begin. The defendant’s occupancy of the car and his resulting proximity to the crime scene are insufficient by themselves to support a conviction of murder in the second degree.”

The judge said defense attorney Steven Novey’s motion to set aside the verdict is grounded in applicable law.

“There were no witness descriptions of the perpetrator to be challenged, no alleged confessions by Roots of which to challenge the reliability or credibility of the testifying witness, and no physical evidence which the Commonwealth could use to argue that Roots was the perpetrator,” Novey wrote in his motion.

At trial, prosecutors presented video surveillance evidence shot from a camera at a house where the victim ultimately crashed the stolen car that shows a person exit a second car, approach the crashed car and shoot Mitchell in the head. Prosecutors argued that was Roots, but the judge said neither the race nor gender of the shooter can be ascertained from the video.

In a motion filed Monday that asked the judge to reconsider, Chesterfield prosecutors LaToya Croxton and Matthew Gravens argued that Johnson supplanted his view of the evidence for that of the jury’s findings and “improperly found that the jury speculated in reaching its verdict” — and failed to consider the totality of the evidence.

“Instead of allowing this case to proceed through the natural order of events for a criminal matter, this court has subverted the decision-making ability of the jury, despite allowing the jury to hear all the evidence and come to a verdict,” the prosecutors wrote, adding that the more proper venue for the case to be affirmed or reversed would be the Virginia Court of Appeals.

Later Monday, Johnson rejected the prosecution’s motion to reconsider his decision. Roots originally had been scheduled to be sentenced Monday. The jury had recommended he be sentenced to 25 years in prison.

Prosecutors anticipate that Johnson will now sign an order that acquits Roots of all charges. The jury convicted him of second-degree murder, felony use of a firearm and shooting into an occupied vehicle.

The case centers on a series of events that began Sept. 26, 2019, at 4:12 a.m. after police and paramedics found Mitchell unconscious and suffering from a gunshot wound in a silver Hyundai Elantra that veered into a yard and crashed outside a home in the 6200 block of Gatesgreen Drive — four-tenths of a mile from where Roots was staying with his grandmother at the time.

Investigators determined that the car, owned by Tarabay-Whitfield, had been stolen a short time earlier from outside the grandmother’s home in the 6000 block of Barrister Road. Investigators found Tarabay-Whitfield’s purse and wallet inside the car, and glass fragments in the street on Barrister Road near the stop sign at the intersection of Gatesgreen Drive.

Home surveillance video viewed by police showed the stolen Hyundai approaching the home where it ultimately crashed, along with another vehicle that pulled up behind the wrecked Hyundai. According to the prosecution’s account, a male emerged from the driver’s seat, approached the Hyundai and lifted his left arm toward the driver’s-side window — and at that precise moment, a sound similar to a gunshot is heard in the video.

The state medical examiner determined that Mitchell was shot in the left side of his head. He suffered another injury on the left side of his neck from fractured glass. The two injuries resulted from separate incidents, prosecutors said.

Police also found tire markings from the Hyundai, which indicated Mitchell had applied the brakes intentionally. The markings extended from just beyond the stop sign at the intersection of Gatesgreen Drive and Barrister Road into the flower bed in front of the house where he crashed, according to the prosecution’s evidence.

Police obtained phone records and location data for Roots and Tarabay-Whitfield from that night. They show that Tarabay-Whitfield arrived at Roots’ grandmother’s home at 3:26 a.m. after Tarabay-Whitfield left early from work, and that Roots was at or near that home during text messages with Tarabay-Whitfield.

Records also show that Roots’ and Tarabay-Whitfield’s cellphones traveled away from the Barrister Road address at 4:11 a.m. and arrived at the crime scene 46 seconds later — precisely at the time the video surveillance footage showed two vehicles rapidly approaching the Gatesgreen Drive residence. Mitchell was alive at 3:54 a.m. and shot by 4:12 a.m., prosecutors said.

“At some point during those 18 minutes prior to him being shot, Bryson Mitchell stole Tarabay-Whitfield’s Hyundai Elantra while it was parked outside of 6112 Barrister Road,” prosecutors said. “The evidence showed that Tarabay-Whitfield and Roots would have been outside of 6112 Barrister Road at the time of the theft.”

Tarabay-Whitfield was close enough to her Hyundai when it was stolen that her phone synced back up to her car’s Bluetooth system, according to the prosecution’s account.

Phone location data for both defendants show their cellphones left the crime scene at 4:12 a.m., which prosecutors said is consistent with the surveillance video that shows the shooter getting back into the driver’s seat of the other car and fleeing the scene toward Krause Road.

The data show the defendants heading toward the home of Roots’ mother in Chester. But after Tarabay-Whitfield called Roots’ mother, the defendants’ cellphones reversed course and headed back to the Barrister Road address, where they arrived at 4:27 a.m.

Phone records from Tarabay-Whitfield’s cellphone also showed that she began conducting Google searches for “car stolen and wrecked” about 5:10 a.m. Tarabay-Whitfield reported her car stolen at 7:20 a.m.

Roots’ cellphone, “despite months of almost constant activity prior to September 26, 2019, would be turned off that afternoon and never used again,” the prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said there was no evidence that Roots or Tarabay-Whitfield knew the victim or had interacted with him before the night he was killed.

Tarabay-Whitfield is scheduled to be tried Oct. 18 by a jury on charges of being an accessory to murder after the fact and obstruction of justice.

0 Comments

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News