MINERAL — Last December, Lucille Waddy went to the tiny office at the entrance to Six-O-Five Mobile Home Park with a money order for her rent, as she has done for nearly 20 years. Only then did she find out that the monthly cost of renting a lot for her mobile home had jumped from $445 to $625, an increase of more than 40%.
Waddy, 77, is living on Social Security retirement benefits, but she’s paying the increased rent, although other residents are refusing and taking the issue to court.
“I didn’t want to get put out,” she said. “I don’t have anywhere to go.”
Waddy doesn’t understand why the rent shot up. “I still don’t know who owns the trailer park,” she said.

Catherine Bennett, 70, left, and her sister, Cheryl Bennett, 65, tenants of Six-O-Five Mobile Home Park in Louisa County, worry about raised rent, which was up from $445 to $625, with a new owner of the park. Cheryl Bennett is on disability, and Catherine Bennett has to work extra days as a substitute teacher to pay the difference.
The answer is Homes of America LLC, a New Jersey-based spinoff of the same private equity firm that created Alden Global Capital, an investment firm that owns The Virginian-Pilot and Daily Press and other newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune. Alden, as a minority shareholder in Lee Enterprises Inc., failed in an attempted 2021 hostile takeover of Lee, the Iowa-based company that owns the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
People are also reading…
That same year, Homes of America purchased Six-O-Five and The Hill Mobile Home Park in Bowling Green for $3.7 million from a Henrico County-based mobile home park company owned by Jimmy Benson, who confirmed the sale and said he is no longer involved in either property. The park here in Louisa, which accounted for $3.4 million of the sale price, has more than 100 lots, while the one in Bowling Green, near Fort Walker, a U.S. Army base formerly known as Fort A.P. Hill, has fewer than 30.
A national wave
The new owner is part of a national wave of private investment companies that have attracted intense public scrutiny for buying mobile home parks and then jacking up lot rents and fees for residents who own manufactured homes that aren’t actually mobile, but fixed to lots they don’t own. The trend coincides with a decline in affordable housing, as rents rose during the COVID-19 pandemic, making manufactured homes an attractive option for investors, often at the expense of people who live in them.
“It’s the only non-subsidized affordable housing, but it’s not affordable,” said Victoria Horrock, senior attorney at Legal Aid Justice Center in Richmond, which is representing almost a dozen residents at Six-O-Five, about 50 miles west of downtown Richmond.
Last fall, Gov. Glenn Youngkin made affordable housing a priority by launching his “Make Virginia Home” initiative to loosen restrictions on housing in local zoning ordinances and comprehensive plans. The governor made little progress on the issue in the General Assembly this year, but the Virginia Housing Commission is studying a number of policy proposals for possible action in the next legislative session in January.
Finding affordable housing has become a challenge in this part of Louisa, wedged between the Interstate 95 and 64 corridors, which make it attractive to people moving from Richmond, Charlottesville, Fredericksburg and even Northern Virginia. The area is already a mecca for owners of second homes near scenic Lake Anna, but housing is becoming less affordable for working class, elderly and disabled residents with limited income, often living in homes they often cannot afford to repair.

Six-O-Five Mobile Home Park in Louisa County is caught up in a national trend of mobile home parks being bought by big private equity and hedge funds, which then jack up the rents on the underlying land and shift basic costs (trash collection, water, electricity) to residents who generally have few financial resources to pay.
“You drive around the county and see places you think are uninhabited, but people are actually living there,” said Kim Hyland, executive director of the Fluvanna-Louisa Housing Foundation.
‘Where are they going to go?’
“Where are they going to go?” Hyland asked about Six-O-Five residents. “Louisa is right in the middle of all of it. It’s being squeezed from every direction.”
The mobile home park opened in the early 1970s and initially helped to house workers at the nearby North Anna Power Station operated by the Virginia Electric & Power Co., now known as Dominion Energy. The 34-acre property sits between U.S. Routes 522 and 33, 10 miles from Interstate 64 at Shannon Hill, but “it is most definitely not included in our growth areas,” said Josh Gillespie, director of the Louisa Department of Community Development.
The county is working with Hyland’s foundation to expand the supply of affordable housing in Louisa, using $775,000 in funding that Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, secured when she represented the area. It’s also promoting other affordable housing options, including the right of homeowners to add accessory dwelling units, rehabilitation of existing vacant units, and development of county-approved apartment and neighborhood projects.
But if residents suddenly had to leave the mobile home park and find new housing, Gillespie said, “There would be very little in the way of rental opportunities immediately available probably within 30 miles.”
Customize your experience so you see the stories most important to you. And sign up for personalized notifications so you don't miss any important news.
TO DOWNLOAD
For Android users: https://go.richmond.com/googleplay
For Apple users: https://go.richmond.com/apple
Legal Aid has filed civil actions in Louisa County General District Court for 11 residents of Six-O-Five, alleging that the owner violated state law by raising their rents without the 60-day notice required under the Virginia Manufactured Home Lot Rental Act and seeking repayment of higher rents that some of its clients have already paid. It’s also helping residents organize a community association to push for protection of all Six-O-Five residents against further rent increases.

Gavino Felipe, who works at a wooden pallet company, has lived at Six-O-Five Mobile Home Park with his sister and niece for more than six years.
“You don’t know when they’re going to raise the rent again,” said Gavino Felipe, who is leading the effort for residents. “You don’t know when it’s going to become 800 or 1,000” dollars a month, he said.
Felipe, who works at a local wooden pallet company, has lived at the park with his sister and niece for more than six years. Like many of the residents, Felipe is from Latin America and doesn’t speak English. He said many of his neighbors work as laborers for construction and landscaping businesses.
Homes of America already faces ongoing litigation for its treatment of residents in a mobile home park it purchased in Christiansburg, as Cardinal News first reported in November, and five parks that it bought in Mercer County, W.Va., in the Bluefield area along the state line with Virginia.
‘We don’t matter to them’
In an article that Columbia Journalism Review published this month, freelance journalist Julie Reynolds reported that Homes of America had acquired more than 100 mobile home parks in 17 states since early 2021. Reynolds, who formerly worked for a California newspaper bought by Alden Global Capital, also detailed the ties between Homes of America and Smith Management LLC, which share the same address in Englewood, New Jersey.
The story estimates Randall Smith, founder of Smith Management and Alden, and Alden President Heath Freeman have invested more than $150 million in mobile home parks over the past two years.
Verifying those ties isn’t easy because Homes of America is registered in Delaware, where ownership isn’t required to be publicly disclosed. The company did not leave a message at the New Jersey phone number listed by the Better Business Bureau, which has not accredited it.
Chief Operating Officer Bryon Fields, a former intern at Alden and cornerback on the Duke University football team, did not return messages left on his telephone voicemail.
Laura (no last name given), listed by Six-O-Five as the primary contact for park residents, answered a call but said, “I have no comment at this time.”
The lack of communication with Six-O-Five residents infuriates Dorothy Brimingham, one of the 11 plaintiffs in the civil actions against the park’s owner. Brimingham, like Waddy and Felipe, said she learned of the rent increase when she went to the office to pay in December. She said she paid the higher rent initially, but not anymore. A hearing is scheduled on the cases on June 13.
“We don’t matter to them,” she said.
Brimingham, 48, has lived at Six-O-Five for more than four years. She shares the trailer with her husband and her 22-year-old son. She is disabled by a back condition — spinal stenosis and eight herniated disks — that she attributed to years of construction work and heavy lifting in warehouse jobs. She relies on disability payments, government food assistance and Medicaid health coverage, which she said could be jeopardized if her husband works and makes too much money.
“I’d like to go back and work, but my body won’t let me,” she said.

Dorothy Brimingham spends time with her cats at her mobile home at Six-O-Five park on May 15. She has adopted abandoned cats in her neighborhood. Many tenants cannot afford pets and give them up.
After paying her rent and electric bill, Brimingham said, “that leaves me $13 a month to live on.”
She’s also angry at a recent pitch by the owner to buy mobile homes that residents own. In a flier distributed to residents at the park, the owner touted a buyback product that “offers all homeowners flexibility and access to liquidity.”
Brimingham called the proposal a ploy to take advantage of residents who are struggling to afford the higher rents. “They’re being a snake in the grass talking about sell your trailers if you’re tired of all the expenses of the park,” she said in a text message.
Residents received notice last month that they will be billed each month for any current balance in their accounts, monthly rent “and other recurring charges,” utility charges and an administrative fee of $5.50. Brimingham said the company had been charging her a $50 late fee each month even before the rent increase, even though she said she pays on time.

Dorothy Brimingham's cat peeks out at Six-O-Five Mobile Home Park on May 15.
Horrock, the legal aid attorney, said the lease allows the owner to charge for trash removal, but not water and sewer service. Six-O-Five is served by well water and an on-site waste treatment station.
The park was already dilapidated and unkempt, but Brimingham says its condition has gotten worse. “There’s trash everywhere,” she said. “Half the trailers are empty. The roads are falling apart.”
Hyland, at the Fluvanna-Louisa Housing Foundation, said, “It’s really rough.”
Gillespie, the community development director, agreed that the roads within the mobile home park “are in terrible condition.”
He said the county has been pushing the new owner to fill potholes and improve the park’s private roads as a top priority, followed by grounds maintenance and clearing out abandoned mobile home units.
Gillespie said the company has committed to repairs and having a park manager on-call full time, if not on-site.
‘No other place to go’
Louisa spokesperson Cindy King said the new owner told the county that “the increased rent will directly benefit park maintenance.”
Mobile home parks have become an attractive investment because of the income they generate, said Del. Carrie Coyner, R-Chesterfield, a zoning attorney who is pushing for state and local policies that elevate manufactured housing as an option for people who cannot afford market rents or home mortgages.
The return on investment “is very, very high because of how many units you have on such a small piece of property,” Coyner said. “It is a very lucrative property to invest in and own.”
The Norfolk real estate firm that advertised Six-O-Five and The Hill estimated the annual net operating income for the two parks at $373,509, based on income and expenses in the first nine months of 2019.
“It’s a cash flow model: You pay money, you get rent in return,” said Benson, who said he had owned Six-O-Five for about 10 years.
But critics of the industry say outside investors maximize those profits by raising rents, shifting operating expenses to residents and deferring maintenance of the parks.
“They want the profit, but they don’t want to take care of the property,” said Yvonne Maldonado, a former mobile home resident in New York who serves now as co-director of Manufactured Home Action, an advocacy group for residents of manufactured homes.
For residents who own manufactured homes that they cannot move, “there is literally no other place to go,” Maldonado said.
This story has been updated to note that Cardinal News first reported that Homes of America faces ongoing litigation for its treatment of residents in a mobile home park it purchased in Christiansburg. This story initially credited the wrong news outlet for reporting that story.
Buy vs. rent: A comparison of housing costs in U.S. cities
Buy vs. rent: A comparison of housing costs in U.S. cities

Potential homeowners may feel left in the dust with recent increases in costs and interest rates. But beyond the down payment, the right combination of factors in some U.S. cities leads to lower monthly mortgage costs than rental prices. This creates a favorable environment for starter homes, downsizing for retirement or even house hacking. On the other hand, homeownership goals don't exactly make for the most financially secure path in other cities.
To help renters and potential homeowners identify opportunities where it costs less to buy a home than rent one – or where they're better off renting – SmartAsset examined monthly mortgage and rental costs in nearly 600 cities nationwide.
Key Findings:
- Florida cities dominate the top 10 places where homes are cheapest to buy relative to renting. These cities include Deltona, Palm Bay, Kissimmee, Palm Coast, North Port and Port St. Lucie. However, there are outliers where a mortgage costs more than rent per month – like in Miami Beach, Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Boca Raton.
- Only six cities offer cheaper housing costs for homeowners than renters. Homeowners in two Arizona cities (Surprise and Avondale) and in four Florida cities (Deltona, Palm Bay, Kissimmee and Palm Coast) pay less on average for a mortgage than a monthly rent check.
- Homeownership costs twice as much as renting in some parts of California and New York. Monthly mortgage costs in Berkeley, Santa Monica, San Francisco and many others far outpace the cost of rent, costing as much as $2,000 more than rent. Meanwhile, cities in New York – including New Rochelle, New York City and Mount Vernon – also top the list of most expensive mortgages when compared to rent.
Where It Makes More Sense to Buy

The top 10 cities where it makes most sense to buy than rent have the smallest differences between mortgage costs and rent. In most of these places, a monthly mortgage payment is actually cheaper than rent. As the data shows, the difference between mortgage and rental costs varies widely by city. A wide variety of factors influence housing markets.
1. Surprise, Arizona
Located just northwest of Phoenix and home to about 150,000 people, Surprise has the largest net difference between mortgage and rental costs. Rent here averages $192 more than a mortgage per month. Potential homeowners are looking at a median home value of $282,300.
2. Deltona, Florida
Deltona, located northeast of Orlando, has an average monthly mortgage cost of $1,187. Meanwhile, rent here costs $168 more – an average of $1,355. Consequently, homeownership is a popular option, with over 75% of homes owner-occupied. Residents have about a half hour drive to the coast.
3. Palm Bay, Florida
Palm Bay renters pay $130 more than their homeowner counterparts per month. The median value of a home is $186,100, with an average monthly mortgage of $1,174. Renters comparatively pay $1,304 per month. Over 120,000 people call Palm Bay home.
4. Avondale, Arizona
Monthly mortgages in Avondale cost $1,499, while rent costs $1,592. But only about 60% of residents take advantage of this $93 difference. The median home value is $252,400, upon which annual property taxes would cost $1,615.
5. Kissimmee, Florida
Kissimmee mortgages cost $1,281 per month, which is $80 less than rents, which average $1,361. This city of nearly 80,000 people is located on Lake Tokopekaliga, just south of Orlando. Only 45% of residents here are homeowners, leaving lots of opportunity for first-time homebuyers.
6. Palm Coast, Florida
The median home value in Palm Coast is $238,700. While the take-rate is relatively high for homeownership, this is the last of the cities where monthly mortgage costs are less than rental costs – albeit only by $34. Rents here cost $1,403 per month on average, while homeowners pay $1,369.
7. North Port, Florida
North Port is the city closest to rent and mortgage parity, meaning that the net difference between both costs is smallest out of all the cities considered. Even though it's technically more expensive to own than rent here, the monthly mortgage cost of $1,293 is only $2 more than a monthly rental.
8. Queen Creek, Arizona
With under 70,000 residents, Queen Creek is the smallest city in the top 10 by population. But, it also has the highest median home value at $407,800. The average monthly mortgage payment is $2,054, while rent costs just $28 less ($2,026). Nearly 88% of homes are owner-occupied.
9. Port St. Lucie, Florida
Port St. Lucie is the largest city by population in the top 10, with more than 215,000 residents. Homeowners here pay $1,595 monthly for a mortgage, while renters pay $31 less. Property taxes on the average home value of $245,900 would be $3,221.
10. Hammond, Indiana
Hammond offers the lowest rent and mortgages in the top 10, so it is more affordable from a nominal standpoint. Monthly mortgage costs are $992, while rents are $959. Still, homeowner occupancy sits around 60%.
Where It Makes Most Sense to Rent

On the other hand of the spectrum, buying into these markets may not offer the same opportunities. In fact, the average rents in these cities are generally less than half of mortgage costs.
- Berkeley, California
- Santa Monica, California
- San Francisco, California
- Newton, Massachusetts
- New Rochelle, New York
- Redmond, Washington
- Union City, New Jersey
- Yorba Linda, California
- Santa Barbara, California
- Elizabeth, New Jersey
Methodology
To find the net difference in mortgage and rent costs, we compared the following variables from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for 591 cities for which data was available. These included:
- Mortgage cost: Data comes from "Financial Characteristics of Housing Units With a Mortgage" based on the 2021 American Community Survey. This study examined median monthly housing costs for owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage.
- Rent cost: Data comes from "Selected Housing Characteristics" based on the 2021 American Community Survey, specifically the gross median rent for occupied units paying rent.
Median home value data also comes from data from the 2021 American Community Survey. Property tax data comes from SmartAsset's property tax calculator.
Limitations
- This study did not account for down payments or one-time upfront costs of closing on a home. This may include real estate transfer taxes, appraisal fees, agent fees, title fees and lender charges.
- A select group of monthly mortgage payment costs were listed as $4,000+ in the raw data. These were assigned a value of $4,000 for the purposes of this study.
- While mortgages may be correlated with home prices, they are not directly tied to current median home values. Mortgages are a function of interest rates when they are issued, loan type, property taxes, credit ratings, home insurance, and other factors.
This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker Media.