Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Editorial: COVID-19 vaccine distribution has a fairness problem
Vaccine distribution

Editorial: COVID-19 vaccine distribution has a fairness problem

  • 1
{{featured_button_text}}
20210206_MET_COV_NUMBERS_AWE01

On Friday, Cassie Beamon, a Virginia Department of Health nurse, administered a COVID-19 vaccine at Fox Manor Apartments in Richmond.

Figuring out how to combine science with fairness in COVID-19 vaccine distribution is a tricky puzzle. Science can help predict how to distribute limited doses to minimize overall deaths, but that means acting fast, which might compromise fairness. That’s how we end up with outrage when hospital administrators get shots ahead of nursing home residents or, as The Atlantic reports, offspring ahead of their elderly parents.

Perfection is impossible. But there’s a way to do justice to both science and ethics: Focus vaccines on geographic hot spots and the elderly. Experts say both are important — and getting the vaccines to the hard-hit areas could correct racial disparities that already are appearing in the early rollout.

Focusing on geographic hot spots can help minimize spread of the disease, which also will minimize the risk of new vaccine-evading variants cropping up. The more people get infected, the greater the number of viral particles out there and the greater number of mutant versions will arise. And that means the greater the odds a dangerous variant will spread.

Yale epidemiologist Robert Hecht has been studying COVID-19 in Massachusetts and found the virus vastly is more prevalent in some areas than others. “We’re not just talking about a marginal difference of 5 or 10%,” he says. “We are talking about 200, 300% differences.”

He likens vaccinating these hot spots to firefighters starting where flames are burning hottest. And the hot spots are hot for a reason, he says — it’s where people have in-person jobs, can’t afford not to work and live in multigenerational housing, sometimes taking in extra tenants to make ends meet.

The hot spots also are places recent immigrants come to live, and many don’t have any connection to the health care system. They might be reluctant to seek testing or medical help because of their immigration status, he says.

Dousing the flames in these hot spots will prevent them from spreading elsewhere. “You can get multiple benefits out of this,” he says. It’s the right thing to do from an epidemic control standpoint, he adds. And it could bring some relief to communities that have not had good access to health care through the pandemic.

Sending vaccines to hot spots also is the fair thing to do, since many people in places with high rates of disease live in crowded housing and do high-risk jobs, often not by choice. Many are members of minority groups who disproportionately have been hurt by the virus and its economic fallout.

Demographic data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that too few vaccines have gotten to high-risk people who are Black, American Indian, Alaska Native or Hispanic.

Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law, says it’s important to separate problems with vaccine allocation plans from what happens in reality. The CDC and the National Academy of Sciences have created thoughtful plans that give the most vulnerable people priority, she says, but inadequate funding has made it hard to carry out those plans. And some states are creating plans on their own.

With poor funding for distributing vaccines, she says, it’s been cheaper to send doses to big hospitals, even though that’s led to hospital administrative staff getting the shots before many people who are more at risk.

What she says would ethically make the most sense would be to get vaccine doses to regions where people have been underserved throughout the pandemic. “I am really concerned we are seeing racial imbalance in vaccine distribution,” she says, adding that the way to improve fairness to minorities is to bring the vaccines to them.

Reiss also says it’s important to avoid judging people who have behavior-related health problems. While social media has fueled some outrage against people with smoking-related illnesses getting the vaccine early, she says such judgment ethically is dubious.

We don’t deny people care for skin cancer because they went out in the sun, she says. “The fact that someone got addicted to cigarettes and did not manage to quit … does not seem a reason to let them die from COVID,” she says. Beyond that, smoking addiction is more common in socioeconomic groups that are more likely to be at risk from the virus.

And it’s a waste of energy getting outraged at “selfish” people getting vaccinated “out of turn.” As some infectious disease experts are arguing, the vaccines likely do have some effect on reducing transmission, so getting one is not all selfish — it’s part of a civic duty, and could help protect others and end the pandemic.

Above all, we shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Getting too rigid with allocation standards could mean throwing away doses — and that’s the worst of all possible worlds.

— Adapted from an op-ed by Faye Flam, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist

Related to this story

Most Popular

Living in fear of COVID-19 has taken its toll on all of us. As a nurse, I believe the science. No one likes to wear a mask. Just do it. No one…

Remember the Richmond 34. We applaud the Richmond Flying Squirrels for its initiatives to honor the group of Black students at Virginia Union …

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News